Improvement box language

Theo: “For the needs-improvement box, could all the uses of “require” change to “need”, or better still tone it all down to “could use”? The current wording seems rather harsh on users who have just contributed something and are suddenly confronted with a big yellow billboard telling them they did a crappy job of it. The billboard is good, but the language could be softer.”

Another softer variant for the improvement box.

This question can be improved by:

  • adding sources to pros and cons
  • adding descriptions to pros and cons
  • adding more pros and cons to options